Özet:
In this thesis the identity problem in literary works of Cevat Şakir (known as “Balıkçı”) will be studied, in terms of his approach to the “sea”. In his works, a systematic discussion of a genesis thesis cannot be seen. Instead, identities found in his literary production do not create a homogenous whole and it is difficult to find a clear answer to solve the identity problem of Turkish Republic in his works. His works are not academic and do not propose strict explanations. He tries to construct a Mediterranean identity through the “sea” element. However, he does not prepare an agenda to explain his theories clearly. Instead, one may not separate his fictional books from his essay books. His so-called historical approach becomes popular because it goes hand in hand with the official cultural policy of regime. His national narratives could be explained with Homi K. Bhabha’s concept of “ambivalence” and Partha Chatterjee’s “thematic-problematic” dichotomy. Intriguingly, his so-called historical approach gets popular because he puts forward the view that Turkish history is secular therewith, he defends the idea that Turkish identity was corrupted during Ottomans’ dynasty. In parallel, his approach had a remarkable place in official culture policy of Republican Regime. As it will be demonstrated in this research, Cevat Şakir is a popular author who created a new national narrative in Turkish literature with the identity problem through the “sea” element therefore he has still a place in literary canon today as well.
