Abstract:
This thesis analyzes the use of the name and memory of the Nicaean rule as a means of opposition and criticism after the usurpation of the throne by Michael VIII Palaiologos. The thesis claims that following the usurpation of the throne a new critical discourse emerged based on the memory of the Laskarids. The events and reactions after the usurpation that emerged in the name of the deposed dynasty will be examined to support this argument. Among the things that will be analyzed, there are plots and revolts against the ruling dynasty as well as socioreligious reactions like the sanctification of Laskarid figures. Moreover, the new patterns of kaiserkritik will be analyzed to have a broader image of the impact of Laskarid memory in the oppositional ideology of the time period. Finally, the Palaiologan reaction to the current situation will be examined by analyzing their reaction and approach to the memory of the Laskarids and how they tried to absorb it. Consequently, the main goal of this thesis is to achieve a complete image of the impact of Nicaean memory as an oppositional tool in the period following its deposition.
