dc.contributor |
Graduate Program in Philosophy. |
|
dc.contributor.advisor |
Irzık, Gürol. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Muğaloğlu, Ebru Zeynep Aktürk. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-03-16T11:54:54Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2023-03-16T11:54:54Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2001. |
|
dc.identifier.other |
PHIL 2001 M83 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://digitalarchive.boun.edu.tr/handle/123456789/16116 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Radical constructivism is a popular version of constructivism. It is introduced as an unconventional approach to knowing and learning by its leading representative Ernest von Glasersfeld. In my thesis, first, I present von Glasersfeld's conception of knowledge in general and scientific knowledge in particular and their implications for science education. Then, I critically examine the radical constructivist theory in the light of the following questions: 1. Does radical constructivism present a valid theory of knowledge and scientific knowledge? 2. Can radical constructivism fulfill the main aims of science education as a theory of learning and teaching? Finally, I conclude that radical constructivism is not only a poor substitute for traditional epistemology but also fails to meet the main obj ecti ves of science education as a theory of learning and teaching. |
|
dc.format.extent |
30 cm. |
|
dc.publisher |
Thesis (M.A.)- Bogazici University. Institute of Social Sciences, 2001. |
|
dc.relation |
Includes appendices. |
|
dc.relation |
Includes appendices. |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Science teachers -- Training of. |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Constructivism (Philosophy) |
|
dc.title |
Radical constructivism in science education |
|
dc.format.pages |
viii, 72 leaves; |
|